Login |  


WWF South Africa Comments on the 2013/4 Budget

Categories: HEADLINES, Government, Wildlife Conservation | Author: WesleyA | Posted: 2013/04/05 | Views: 3189
The Budget Speech Highlights How Much Money is Needed to Upgrade...
WWF South Africa (WWF-SA) welcomes the 2013 Budget’s clear indication of government’s commitment towards addressing the increasing problem of acid-mine drainage (AMD) and derelict mines. However, the organisation is disappointed at the level of expenditure allocated to addressing this key threat to the country’s water security.

The planned expenditure on AMD and derelict mines from the 2013 Budget is R150 million, this is orders of magnitude short of the R30 billion estimated by the auditor general in 2009,” says Dr Deon Nel, the Head of WWF-SA’s Biodiversity Unit.

“There are currently nearly 6000 derelict mines in the country. The longer we wait to address this issue, the more it is going to cost the South African taxpayer in the long-term”.
In addition, the issue continues to be compounded by loopholes in mining legislation relating to provision for mining rehabilitation. Last year, WWF-SA released a report* on the finance required to rehabilitate South Africa’s mines.

The report identified key loopholes in the current methods to work out how much money is required post-closure to ensure a safe environment. The current methods used do not account for long-term water treatment, resulting in a situation where the taxpayer is forced to foot the bill for long-term rehabilitation on behalf of mining companies.

“We are already struggling to address the current threat of AMD in the Witwatersrand and Olifants catchments, yet we are still planning to mine in highly water-sensitive areas. As a water-scarce country, South Africa cannot afford to further compromise our water security”, says Nel. “We need to see far more commitment and proactive action on this matter. As a start, we urgently need to revise the way we are planning mining in our water source areas and areas where AMD is a significant risk.”
The budget speech highlights how much money is needed to upgrade our engineered water infrastructure to meet basic service demands; however no mention was made of our ecological infrastructure. These are the catchments, rivers and wetlands that supply us with the water.

WWF recognises the need for man-made water infrastructure; however it believes that spending on engineered infrastructure in isolation of spending equitably on our natural assets is fruitless expenditure.
“Water security is critical to our country’s long-term development and well-being. We need a long-term view that will protect our natural assets. We need to start strategically planning as if water matters – because it does”, concludes Nel. 
Dr Deon Nel

Head: Biodiversity Unit
WWF South Africa

Article taken from: NGOPulse

Print Bookmark and Share

Return to previous page


News Categories











Copyright 2011 by WeCanChangeOurWorld   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement